Report on the Audit of the Financial Statements (continued)
is the measurement date on which the
fair value of the Class B Ordinary
shares granted is based. Identification
of whether the performance targets in
Tranche 2 and Tranche 3 of the
promote schedule are a performance
condition or non-vesting condition
affects the period over which the
charge is recognized. Management
has determined that the performance
targets are non-vesting conditions
because the service period ends at
business combination. Probability of
business combination is significant
because the share-based payment
cost is recognised if the business
combination is more likely than not to
be achieved. Significant judgment has
been applied in determination of these
key terms.
Finally, initial measurement of the
share-based payments is at fair value,
which is established by a Monte Carlo
simulation and a discount for lack of
marketability derived using the option
pricing method
assumptions and inputs that are
unobservable.
There is significant risk relating to
valuation at initial recognition of the
Class B Ordinary shares given the
judgmental nature of the matters that
require consideration by management
and those charged with governance.
•Challenged management as to when there
was a shared understanding of the terms and
conditions of the share-based arrangement,
i.e. the grant date;
•Evaluated and challenged managements
judgement as to whether there were implicit
services beyond the date of the business
combination in order to determine that the
performance targets are non-vesting
conditions;
•Challenged management as to the facts and
c
ircumstances that could impact the
probability of business combination, such as
time frame and market conditions; and
•
Evaluated whether management’s
assessment of grant date and probability of
business combination included all relevant
information that has come to our attention in
the audit.
With respect to the procedures we undertook on initial
measurement of the share-based payments at fair
value:
•Documenting and assessing the design and
implementation of the valuation processes
and controls in place;
•Challenging management on key judgments.
In particular, we:
•Challenged the appropriateness of the
valuation technique selected as well as
the underlying assumptions, such as
volatility and time to business
combination;
•Challenged the application of non-market
performance conditions in the valuation
of Class B Ordinary shares at grant date;
and
•Compared key underlying financial data
inputs to external sources, such as peer
group comparisons and marketplace
transaction timelines.
We used the work undertaken by our own valuation
specialist to assist with the above procedures.
In addition, we also considered the appropriateness,
in accordance with relevant accounting standards, of
the disclosures relating to share-based payments.
Based on our assessment of information obtained
from our procedures, we concluded that the sponsor
shares are within the scope of IFRS 2 Share-based
Payment and
judgments relating to the
completeness, accuracy and initial measurement at
fair value of share-based payments to be reasonable.